THE
POST-ELECTION SCENARIO: The Times says that ('enigmatic') President
Rajoy is 'on the ropes'. Best place for him, is almost certainly the
majority view here. Let's hope he fails in his attempts to keep his
job and the PP party in government. Right now, the only thing
preventing new elections next year is the observation that Rajoy and
the PP would be the biggest beneficiaries of this. So, a 'coalition of
the losers' seems to be the best bet. But which one? As negotiations
proceed, the chances are growing that the PP will dump Rajoy in
favour of the ubiquitous female VP known – unaffectionately – as 'The Dwarf'. But semi-officially as La Menina, the Lady-in Waiting. She
made a good show of looking unhappy with the election setbacks for
the party. Inerestingly, the person being lined up to take over from
the leader of the PSOE socialist party is also a woman – the
president of utterly corrupt Andalucia. Plus ça change . . .
EL GORDO:
As usual, I didn't win anything in yesterday's humungous Xmas lottery
draw. But, then again, as usual I didn't buy any tickets for it. BTW
- The winning number was 79140 and the prize was a mere €4m. Which
I, for one, wouldn't really know what to do with. Except to keep it
from ruining my daughters' lives. Possibly by giving most of it away. Surely
something that would increase my popularity with them.
A LAUGH
FROM THE TAX OFFICE: I've mentioned the horrendous Model 720 law of
2012 which hits foreign residents with property back home – or
other assets above €50,000 – even harder than Spanish nationals.
In a 3-page letter which tells you which initial fine (of the
several) you'll have to pay, much of the text is taken up with the
claim that the Tax Office (La Hacienda) went out of its way to
publicise this outrageous development. As lies go, this is a pretty
big one. The Hacienda did nothing to tell those most likely to be hit by it. A
coincidence? I think not. Still, the politicians managed to get away
with everything. So, not everyone is in the same doomed boat. I do
hope no tax inspectors are reading this.
THE EU:
Want to feel both disgusted and impotent?? Read the leader from
today's Times at the end of this post. Once again, we're not all in
the same boat. And guess who isn't. If this isn't enough for you, try
this article on how the EU benefits the far-right in France. And
this, about the impact on EU plans/dreams of the Spanish election.
FINALLY .
. . NEW WORDS: Anyone know what these mean - streamt and strinkled?
Saw them somewhere, as a pair.
And the
Facebook foto: Find the future Lady President in this famous Velázquez painting, Las Meninas. She's either a Lady in Waiting or a dwarf. My guess is the latter.
And a
welcome to our new Dutch reader(s).
THE EU
Bureaucratic
Bonanza in Brussels
The EU
gravy train is back on track and at full throttle
Most European
commissioners, officials, staffers and members of parliament are now
on holiday until January. They may be hoping that public anger over
their profligacy will have died down by then, but by rights it will
burn on well into the new year.
At the end of what was
supposed to be a two-year pay freeze for Brussels bureaucrats, they
have awarded themselves a 2.4 per cent rise, backdated for six
months. A further 2.4 per cent rise has already been approved for
next year and another, larger, increase is expected for 2017. On
retirement, unlike most public and private sector workers the world
over, European civil servants retain the rare luxury of final salary
pensions.
Ten thousand Brussels
officials already earn more than David Cameron when their tax-free
expatriate allowances are taken into account. Another 2,000 or so in
the next salary band are closing in on the euro equivalent of the
prime minister’s £142,500 salary. The number of EU judges doubled
this year alone. Each is paid £197,000 annually, excluding the
backdated Christmas bonus. As the EU workforce expands, so does its
footprint: work is proceeding on a £280 million new home for the
European council, which will meet there only six times a year.
As a homage to EU
insulation and recycling guidelines, this building will restore and
re-use thousands of old window frames. It is a monument to
double-glazing and, like so much European administration, to double
standards. At a time of willed or imposed austerity for most member
states, the EU’s administrative class is growing in number and
self-importance and awarding itself pay rises no other sector of the
European economy can afford. No wonder patience among British voters
is wearing thin.
In May this year
Lefteris Christoforou, a centre-right Cypriot MEP, asked the European
Commission what “the so-called Brussels bureaucracy” costs the EU
and its member states. Four months later he received an answer that
avoided the question except to put the “burden stemming from EU
legislation” at £91 billion. In fact annual spending by the seven
institutions of the EU has risen to £107 billion despite an
undertaking two years ago to cut it by ten billion euros a year. That
pledge translated into cuts in regional aid, but was undermined by an
inexorable rise in the cost of Europe’s civil service and of its
MEPs. The European parliament’s monthly excursion to Strasbourg
costs £150 million a year. It wastes hundreds of thousands of
working hours, with no justification except a 1992 treaty clause that
France refuses to revise because of a marginal benefit to its
economy.
The expansion of the
Brussels bureaucracy since 2000 is in part a result of the expansion
of the EU to include the bulk of eastern Europe. Defenders of the
EU’s loose budgetary controls also point to its spending as a 1 per
cent share of the bloc’s gross income. This is small compared with
spending by national governments or the US federal government, but
the truth is that there is no valid comparison because there is
nothing quite like the EU. No other group of democratic states sets
its remit and priorities with so little deference to democracy. Its
budget commissioner tells The Times today that she hopes to set up a
new public database to bring transparency to EU spending. Good luck
to her, but why did it take so long?
No comments:
Post a Comment